|
| |
 |
|
| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2018 | Volume
: 15
| Issue : 1 | Page : 78-82 |
|
Transvaginal cervical length and amniotic fluid index: Can it predict delivery latency following preterm premature rupture of membrane?
Amal Muneer Mubarak
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Kufa, Kufa, Iraq
| Date of Web Publication | 19-Mar-2018 |
Correspondence Address:
Amal Muneer Mubarak
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Kufa University, Kufa
Iraq
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | 2 |
DOI: 10.4103/MJBL.MJBL_20_18
Background: This study was performed to determine whether transvaginal cervical length (TVCL), amniotic fluid index (AFI), or a combination of both can predict delivery latency within 7 days in women presenting with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROMs). Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational study of TVCL measurements in eighty singleton pregnancies with PPROM between 24–34 weeks. Transvaginal ultrasonography was performed to measure the CL and AFI. Delivery latency was defined as the period from the initial TVCL after PPROM to delivery of the baby, with our primary outcome being delivery within 7 days of TVCL. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were used to test whether the presence of a short TVCL, AFI, or a combination of both affected the risk of delivery within 7 days. Results: The study showed that the validity of CL alone in predicting labor when the cutoff value = 2 cm, the sensitivity = 52.6%, specificity = 69%, positive predictive value (PPV) = 60.6%, negative predictive value (NPV) = 61.7%, and accuracy = 61.25%. The validity of AFI alone when the cutoff value = 5 cm, the sensitivity = 71.1%, specificity = 50%, PPV = 56.3%, NPV = 65.6%, and accuracy = 60%. With a combination of CL and AFI in predicting time of labor after PPROM, the following results were found: sensitivity = 50%, specificity = 92.8%, PPV = 86.4%, NPV = 67.2%, and accuracy = 72.5%. In women with PPROM, we found the ratio of gestational age (GA) ≤30 weeks who labored within 7 days as 44.7% and those labored more than 7 days as 55.3%. Conclusion: Our study showed that there was an increase in PPV when combining AFI and CL in the prediction of time of labor, so women with AFI ≤5 and CL ≤2 had 86.4% risk of delivery within 7 days after PROM. Furthermore, we found that there was no significant association between GA and parity with the prediction time of labor.
Keywords: Expectant management, latency, perinatal outcome, prematurity, preterm premature rupture of membranes
How to cite this article:
Mubarak AM. Transvaginal cervical length and amniotic fluid index: Can it predict delivery latency following preterm premature rupture of membrane?. Med J Babylon 2018;15:78-82 |
How to cite this URL:
Mubarak AM. Transvaginal cervical length and amniotic fluid index: Can it predict delivery latency following preterm premature rupture of membrane?. Med J Babylon [serial online] 2018 [cited 2023 May 28];15:78-82. Available from: https://www.medjbabylon.org/text.asp?2018/15/1/78/227819 |
| Introduction | |  |
Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROMs) complicate only 2% of pregnancies but are associated with 40% of preterm deliveries and can result in significant neonatal morbidity and mortality.[1]
Complications of PPROMs include preterm delivery, chorioamnionitis (13%–60%), placental abruption (4%–12%), endometritis (2%–13%), and cord compression. Another important complication commonly seen with PPROM is fetal malpresentation at delivery.[2] It is often assumed that gestational age (GA) of delivery is the most important factor in the determination of perinatal outcome after PPROM. In the absence of further complications, labor is often induced at 32–34 weeks of gestation.[3],[4] Antibiotics for PPROM could prevent 4% of neonatal deaths due to complications of prematurity and 8% of those due to infection.[5] Erythromycin for women with PPROM is associated with a range of health benefits for the neonate, thus a probable reduction in childhood disability, while co-amoxiclav cannot be routinely recommended for PPROM because of its association with neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis.[6] The volume of amniotic fluid remaining after rupture appears to have prognostic importance in pregnancies before 26 weeks.[7] The prediction of delivery latency could help direct the need for specific interventions such as hospitalization, intensive monitoring, timing of antenatal steroids, and magnesium for neuroprotection.[8]
The aim of this study was to determine whether transvaginal cervical length (TVCL), amniotic fluid index (AFI), or a combination of both can predict delivery latency within 7 days in women presenting with PPROMs.
| Materials and Methods | | |
This cross-sectional observational study was conducted from January 2017 to October 2017 at AL-ZAHRA teaching hospital. This study was approved by scientific and ethical committees at Kufa medical college.
The study includes eighty singleton women with PPROM between 24 and 34 weeks of GA. PPROM was diagnosed by history and physical examination. Nitrazine test was performed by placement of a nitrazine paper in the vaginal fluid collected from the posterior vaginal pool; the nitrazine paper will turn deep blue quickly if the vaginal fluid has an alkaline pH and the membrane is probably intact if the color of the paper remains yellow (pH 5.0–5.5).
Fern-positive test was done by placing sample of the vaginal fluid on a glass slide and allowed to dry under the microscope, looking for a crystallization pattern that would resemble a fern plant. Pooled vaginal fluid was obtained by sterile speculum examination. GA was calculated from the 1st day of the last normal menstrual period and an ultrasound would be performed in early pregnancy when available.
Exclusion criteria included women in labor (defined as painful uterine contractions and cervical dilation of >3 cm confirmed by digital examination), twin pregnancy, fetal heart rate abnormalities, vaginal bleeding or cervical cerclage and sign of chorioamnionitis, and also women with a previous history of preterm labor and with a history of diabetic mellitus or hypertension.
All women were hospitalized and TVCL was performed within 72 h of admission. Measurements of the TVCL were done with an empty maternal bladder. Calipers were placed where the anterior and posterior walls of the cervix were sonographically opposed and the shortest technically best measurements were used. The presence of funneling was noted. AFI was recorded at the time of the TVCL measurement.
Prophylactic antibiotics used included amoxicillin 500 mg intravenously every 8 h for 2 days, followed by oral amoxicillin 500 mg every 8 h or erythromycin succinate 500 mg every 6 h for 5 days. Two doses of 12 mg betamethasone were given intramuscularly, 24 h apart.
Patients were monitored by cardiotocography and vital signs four times a day in order to detect fetal distress or imminence of labor. Digital examination was avoided until the onset of labor. Full blood cell count and C-reactive protein titration were performed upon admission, on the 48th h following rupture of membranes, and then once a week.
Our primary end point was prediction of delivery latency period within 7 days from performance of the TVCL at admission. To provide a more meaningful risk assessment for clinical purposes, TVCL and AFI were analyzed as dichotomous variables as <2.0 and >2.0 cm for TVCL and <5 and >5 cm for AFI, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were used to examine whether the presence of TVCL, AFI, or a combination of both characteristics affected the risk of delivery within 7 days.
Statistical analysis
All the statistical analysis was done using the SPSS program (version-20) statistic software package (IBM Corp, 2011). We used Chi-square test for categorical data and independent sample t-test for numerical data. For detection of cutoff value and to find sensitivity and specificity of test, we used receiver operator characteristic curve. P ≤ 0.05 was regarded statistically significant.
| Results | | |
This study was conducted on eighty women with PROM. The mean age of women was 24.6 ± 5.9 years (range, 16–40 years). The parity ranged between 0 and 5. There were 38 women delivered within 7 days of PPROM and 42 women delivered after 7 days of PPROM.
As shown in [Table 1], there was no significant difference in age, parity, and GA, while there was a significant difference in AFI which is lower in those women delivered within 7 days. Furthermore, there was highly significant difference in CL which is less in women delivered within 7 days. | Table 1: Comparison between those delivered within and after 7 days of preterm premature rupture of membrane
Click here to view |
The area under the curve for AFI was 0.629 [Figure 1]. The validity of AFI in predicting time of labor in women with PPROM when the cutoff value was 5 is shown in [Table 2]. | Figure 1: Receiver operating characteristic curve for amniotic fluid index
Click here to view |
 | Table 2: Validity of amniotic fluid index in predicting time of labor after preterm premature rupture of membrane
Click here to view |
The area under the curve for CL was 0.711 [Figure 2]. The validity of CL in predicting the time of labor in women with PPROM when the cutoff value was 2 is shown in [Table 3]. | Table 3: Validity of cervical length in predicting time of labor among women with preterm premature rupture of membrane
Click here to view |
[Table 4] shows that there was an increase in positive predictive value (PPV) when we combine AFI and CL in prediction of time of labor, so women with AFI ≤ 5 and CL ≤ 2 had 86.4% risk of delivery within 7 days after PPROM. | Table 4: Validity of cervical length and amniotic fluid index in predicting time of labor after preterm premature rupture of membrane
Click here to view |
[Table 5] shows that there was no significant association between GA and time of delivery.
| Discussion | | |
Prediction of the latency period can be important, particularly when delivery in a hospital with tertiary level facilities is planned.[9]
Many reports had tested the usefulness of performing a cervical scan in the prediction of preterm labor in PPROM with conflicting results.
Many studies show that short CL was significantly associated with premature delivery after PPROM,[10],[11],[12],[13] these findings were supported by a recent study done by Kathir et al. which shows that posterior cervical angle assessment using transvaginal sonography is an useful tool in assessing the latency interval in women with PPROM. This could help in counseling and planning timely referral to centers with neonatal facilities [14] and this finding supports our study.
Carlan et al.[15] and Fischer and Austin [16] found no relationship between CL and latency period. This may be attributed to the cutoff CL used in their studies. Our study shows the validity of CL in predicting labor in women with PPROM when cutoff = 2 cm [Table 3], with a sensitivity = 52.6%, specificity = 69%, PPV = 60.6%, negative predictive value (NPV) = 61.7%, and accuracy = 61.25%. Other studies assess the use of AFI in predicting latency period in PPROM.
Vermillion et al.[17] showed that an AFI <5 cm after PPROM between 24 and 32 weeks' gestation is associated with shorter latency preceding delivery; this finding has been supported by several authors [18],[19],[20],[21], which indicates that the presence of oligohydramnios in PPROM is related to a shorter latency (interval between rupture of membranes and delivery) compared to PPROM without oligohydramnios, while Borna et al.[22] showed that AFI <5 cm did not have a shorter latency until delivery.
Our study shows the validity of AFI in predicting time of labor in women with PPROM when cutoff = 5 [Table 2], sensitivity = 71.1%, specificity = 50%, PPV = 56.3%, NPV = 65.6%, and accuracy = 60%.
The relation between GA and latency period had also been studied. Jeon et al.[21] reported that earlier GA at PPROM is significantly associated with longer latency duration. Melamed et al.[23] reported that the duration of the latency period was inversely related to GA at admission. Other authors [24],[25],[26] found that an inverse relationship between GA at the time of presentation and latency period was established. Hsieh et al.[27] showed that latency in PPROM at <3 cm was longer in PPROM at ≥30 weeks' gestation in both singleton and twin pregnancies.
This study sought to determine whether CL and AFI would independently predict latency in a period of more than 7 days and whether there is an increase in PPV if used in combination.
Our study showed that there was an increase in PPV when we combine AFI and CL in prediction time of labor, so women with AFI ≤5 cm and CL ≤2 cm had 86.4% risk of delivery within 7 days after PPROM. This result was in agreement with the result of several authors.[28],[29],[30] Studies demonstrate shorter latency period with TVCL ≤2 cm and AFI ≤5 cm in pregnant women who presented with PPROM.
| Conclusion | | |
Our study shows that there was an increase in PPV when we combine AFI and CL in prediction of time of labor, so women with AFI ≤5 and CL ≤2 had 86.4% risk of delivery within 7 days after PPROM. Furthermore, we found that there was no significant association between GA and parity with the prediction time of labor.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Membranes. RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 44. (Minor Amendment October 2010); 2006.  |
| 2. | Manju Monga LF. Spontaneous version following preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Perinatol 2006;23:201-3. |
| 3. | Pasquier JC, Rabilloud M, Picaud JC, Ecochard R, Claris O, Gaucherand P, et al. A prospective population-based study of 598 cases of PPROM between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation: Description, management, and mortality (DOMINOS cohort). Eur J Obstet Gynecol 2005;121:164-70. |
| 4. | Cox SM, Leveno KJ. Intentional delivery versus expectant management with preterm ruptured membranes at 30-34 weeks' gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:875-9. [ PUBMED] |
| 5. | Cousens S, Blencowe H, Gravett M, Lawn JE. Antibiotics for pre-term pre-labour rupture of membranes: Prevention of neonatal deaths due to complications of pre-term birth and infection. Int J Epidemiol 2010;39 Suppl 1:i134-43. [ PUBMED] |
| 6. | Kenyon SL, Tarnow-Mordi W, for the ORACLE Collaborative Group. Broad spectrum antibiotics for spontaneous preterm, prelabor rupture of fetal membranes, the ORACLE I randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2001;357:979-88. |
| 7. | Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ. Preterm labour. William Obstetrics textbook. 24 th ed., McGraw-Hill Education; New York Chicago; 2014. p. 829. |
| 8. | Mercer BM. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes: Current approaches to evaluation and management. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2005;32:411-28. |
| 9. | Gire C, Faggianelli P, Nicaise C, Shojai R, Fiori A, Chau C, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of cervical length in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:565-9. |
| 10. | Rizzo G. Use ultrasound to predict preterm delivery: Do not lose the opportunity. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;8:289-2. |
| 11. | Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med 1996;334:567-72. |
| 12. | Çetin C, Büyükkurt S, Cömert E, Özlü F, Bahar N, Demir C, et al. Predictive factors for latency period in viable pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2015;12:30-3. |
| 13. | Bryant A, Sinclair T, Murtha A. Prediction of the latency period by cervical length in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191: S104. |
| 14. | Kathir V, Maurya D, Keepanasseril A. Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervix in prediction of admission to delivery interval in preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;20:1-4. |
| 15. | Carlan SJ, Richmond LB, O'Brien WF. Randomized trial of endovaginal ultrasound in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:458-61. |
| 16. | Fischer RL, Austin JD. Cervical length measurement by translabial sonography in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes: Can it be used to predict the latency period or peripartum maternal infection? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21:105-9. |
| 17. | Vermillion ST, Kooba AM, Soper DE. Amniotic fluid index values after preterm premature rupture of the membranes and subsequent perinatal infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:271-6. |
| 18. | Park JS, Yoon BH, Romero R, Moon JB, Oh SY, Kim JC, et al. The relationship between oligohydramnios and the onset of preterm labor in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:459-62. |
| 19. | Mercer BM, Rabello YA, Thurnau GR, Miodovnik M, Goldenberg RL, Das AF, et al. The NICHD-MFMU antibiotic treatment of preterm PROM study: Impact of initial amniotic fluid volume on pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:438-45. |
| 20. | Piazze J, Anceschi MM, Cerekja A, Brunelli R, Meloni P, Marzano S, et al. Validity of amniotic fluid index in preterm rupture of membranes. J Perinat Med 2007;35:394-8. |
| 21. | Jeon SR, Kwon J, Kim WH, Park YW. Prognostic factors associated with prediction of longer latency in PPROM. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:S190. |
| 22. | Borna S, Borna H, Khazardoost S, Hantoushzadeh S. 'Perinatal outcome in preterm premature rupture of membranes with Amniotic fluid index <5 (AFI <5). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2004;4:15. |
| 23. | Melamed N, Hadar E, Ben-Haroush A, Kaplan B, Yogev Y. Factors affecting the duration of the latency period in preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009;22:1051-6. |
| 24. | Singhal S, Puri M, Gami N. An Analysis of Factors Affecting the Duration of Latency Period and Its Impact on Neonatal Outcome in Patients with PPROM. Int J Infertility Fetal Med 2012;3:87-91. |
| 25. | Aziz N, Cheng YW, Caughey AB. Factors and outcomes associated with longer latency in preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21:821-5. |
| 26. | Levy GA, Goldman I, Wiznitzer A, Mazor M. The duration of the latency period is inversely associated with gestational age. Vol. 283. Factors Affecting the Latency Period in Patients with Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes; 2011. p. 707-10. |
| 27. | Hsieh YY, Chang CC, Tsai HD, Yang TC, Lee CC, Tsai CH, et al. Twin vs. singleton pregnancy. Clinical characteristics and latency periods in preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Reprod Med 1999;44:616-20. |
| 28. | Rizzo G, Capponi A, Angelini E, Vlachopoulou A, Grassi C, Romanini C, et al. The value of transvaginal ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix in predicting preterm delivery in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:23-9. |
| 29. | Tsoi E, Fuchs I, Henrich W, Dudenhausen JW, Nicolaides KH. Sonographic measurement of cervical length in preterm prelabor amniorrhexis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:550-3. |
| 30. | Mehra S, Amon E, Hopkins S, Gavard JA, Shyken J. Transvaginal cervical length and amniotic fluid index: Can it predict delivery latency following preterm premature rupture of membranes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:400.e1-9. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]
|
Search Pubmed for