• Users Online: 648
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 341-346

Preoperative predilection of conversion to open in laparoscopic cholecystectomy


1 Department of Surgery, Al-imam Alsadeq Teaching Hospital, Babil Health Directorate, Babylon Province, Hilla, Iraq
2 Department of Surgery, Hilla Teaching Hospital, Babil Health Directorate, Babylon Province, Hilla, Iraq
3 Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Babylon, Hilla, Iraq

Date of Submission06-Jul-2020
Date of Acceptance13-Aug-2020
Date of Web Publication14-Dec-2020

Correspondence Address:
Ameer Kadhim Al-Humairi
Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Babylon, Hilla
Iraq
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/MJBL.MJBL_42_20

Get Permissions

  Abstract 


Background: With the new era of laparoscopic surgery within the last three decades, laparoscopic cholecystectomy emerges as the golden standard treatment for gallbladder disease and cholitiasis; laparoscopic treatment not always seems to be successfully completed laparoscopically. Making attempts for completing the procedure it is laparoscopically is challenging some times and conversion occurs. This study is to discuss the conversion main causes try to detect patients at risk factors for conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Objectives: The aim of the study was to predict which patients are having greatest risk factors for possible conversion to open procedure instead of being completed laparoscopically. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional study performed retrospectively from October 2007 to January 2019 to detect the patients at risk factors for conversion in patients who started laparoscopically and conver to open approach occurred started by started via. All the procedures were performed by the same operator team surgeon. Surgery was done at AL-Hilla General Teaching Hospital, AL-Sadeque General Teaching Hospital, and in many private hospitals in Babylon Governance. A routine preoperative history, clinical examinations, and US, EX, and laboratory investigations were done for all patients, while abdominal Computerized Axial Tomography (CAT) scan, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography were done for selected patients if indicated. Many patients have different associated comorbid diseases. There are no selection criteria as all patients have no contraindications for laparoscopic surgery. Results: This study included 344 patients; 62 males (18.0%) and 282 females (82.0%). There are different age groups: the mean age is 42.38 (11–85) years for different gallbladder diseases including calculus cholecystitis, acalculus cholecystitis, microlithiasis, cholecystitis causing biliary pancreatitis, and empyema of gallbladder. Data were analyzed retrospectively as the results of surgical procedures outcome which show that only 11 patients (3.2%) whom underwent conversion from a total of 344 patients of the study. Conclusion: There are several factors associated with increased risk of conversion, but this study showed that there is no association with age, diabetes mellitus, and abnormal anatomical variations as risk factor for conversion.

Keywords: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open cholecystectomy, predictive factors for conversion


How to cite this article:
Raheem AB, Al-Jasmawi HO, Al-Humairi AK. Preoperative predilection of conversion to open in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Med J Babylon 2020;17:341-6

How to cite this URL:
Raheem AB, Al-Jasmawi HO, Al-Humairi AK. Preoperative predilection of conversion to open in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Med J Babylon [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 28];17:341-6. Available from: https://www.medjbabylon.org/text.asp?2020/17/4/341/303254




  Introduction Top


The successful initial attempt of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was announced by Philip Mouret in 1987. A new era of laparoscopic surgery was emerged and revolutionized the scope of surgical endoscopy, and endoscopic surgical interventions using a wide variety of surgical conceptions as well as new technical and strategic procedures were invented and replaced the open surgical concept in many surgical departments. There are preoperative variables and factors that can give signals for risk of conversion in certain patients and cases before surgical procedures conducted. This study will emphasize and discuss these patients' risk factors for conversion.

Laparoscopy was initially practiced by gynecologists, rather than by general surgeons. A German physician and Engineer, Kurt Semm in the 1960s, he treated gynecological cases at the University of Kiel by laparoscopy in university hospital.[1] He described techniques for ovariectomy, adrenalectomy, and myomectomy.[1] At 1982, Semm performed an “endoscopic appendectomy.” The German General Surgeon Erich Mühe, inspired by Semm's success and became interested in cholecystectomy could be performed laparoscopically. In September 12, 1985, during a planned cholecystectomy, he obtained pneumoperitoneum with a Veress needle and introduced the galloscope at the patient's umbilicus to dissect the gallbladder. After that, Dr. Mühe performed an early version of LC within 2 h.[2],[3],[4]

Mühe continued to perform cholecystectomies laparoscopically and found himself amazed with the rapid recovery and enjoyed by those undergoing this new approach alternative to open surgery. To start with, he did his first six laparoscopic cholecystectomies using pnemoperitoneum under optical guidance and the remaining 88 cases using gasless laparoscopy; total 94 cases.[3],[5],[6] He choose the gasless laparoscopy method instead of pnemoperitoneum because it can be done faster and by one incision instead of three to four incisions in the cases of pneumoperitoneum cases.

French Surgeon, Mouret shared his practice with a gynecologist and saw firsthand how laparoscopy improved patient satisfaction and led to increased diagnostic capabilities.[7]

In March 1987, Mouret was scheduled to perform “laparoscopy, gynecological adhesion lyses, and cholecystectomy” for a 50-year-old woman with vague abdominal pain.[8] This woman requested from Mouret to perform the operations of possible pelvic adhesion lyses and cholycystectomy at the same time, which he agreed to do if possible. During his procedure, Mouret explored gallbladder using laparoscope, for the dissection of gallbladder site. He cauterized the cystic artery and clipped the cystic duct with a clip applier.[8] The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy done by Mouret last for 2½ h. He left the case feeling both physically and mentally exhausted as he pondered the “weight of medicolegally of invention instead of doing a classic procedure.”[8] Dubois performed his first LC in April 1988.[7]

To convert from laparoscopy to open cholecystectomy, many factors were evaluated in variable studies; these factors include age, gender, obesity, previous abdominal surgery, ultrasound finding, of gallbladder wall thickness in fasting state, presence of pericholecystic fluid, chronic cholecystitis, liver function test, and intraoperative finding as bleeding, abnormal anatomy of gallbladder including biliary tree, vascular supply, as well as liver conditions, e.g., organomegaly and liver cirrhosis.[9],[10]

The aim of this study was to recognize these factors that are associated with the need to convert from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy, helping the surgeon to discuss the possibility of conversion to patients and to allow more efficient scheduling of surgery.


  Materials and Methods Top


Study design and patients

This is a cross-sectional study conducted retrospectively as surgical outcome results to detect the patients risk factors' for conversion in (344) patients who started laparoscopically and completed after conversion (11 patients) to open approach in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

This study performed retrospectively for a period from October 2007 to Jaunuary 2019. All the procedures were performed by the same operator team surgeon. Surgery was done at Al-Hilla General Teaching Hospital, Al-Sadeque General Teaching Hospital, and in many private hospitals in Babylon Governance, Iraq.

A routine preoperative history, clinical examinations and Ultrasound (US) examination done for all patients and patients distribution according to study variable as shown in [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]. Laboratory investigations were done for all patients, while abdominal CAT scan, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography were done for selected patients if indicated. Many patients have different associated comorbid diseases. There are no selection criteria as all patients have no contraindications for laparoscopic surgery.
Table 1: Patients distribution according to study variables

Click here to view
Table 2: Distribution of patients according to study variables

Click here to view
Table 3: The mean differences of age and body mass index according to outcome

Click here to view


Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 21 (SPSS, IBM Company, Chicago, IL 60606, USA). Frequencies and percentages were depended for categorical variables. Continuous variables were given as (means ± standard deviation [SD]). For comparison between the means of the two groups, we used the independent sample t-test. Fisher's exact test was used to find the association between two categorical variables. P value was accepted as statistically significant if ≥0.05.

Ethical consideration

The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki. It was carried out with patients' verbal and analytical approval before the sample was taken. The study protocol and the subject information and consent form were reviewed and approved by a local ethics committee.


  Results Top


From a total of 344 patients, there 282 females and 62 male with different gallbladder diseases including calculus cholecystitis, acalculus cholecystitis, microlithiasis, gallbladder with microlithiasis causing biliary pancreatitis, and empeyma of gallbladder.

There are only 11 patients (3.2%) in whom conversion occurred from a total of 344 patients as the following findings: males 6 (54%), females 5 (45.5), mean age 49.00 ± 11.76 and body mass index (BMI) was 31.09 ± 2.80 [Table 3] and [Table 4]. Biliary pancreatitis were found in 4 (36%), abnormal anatomy 3 (27.2), acute cholecystitis 4 (36.4%), bleeding 3 (27.2%), chronic cholecystitis 4 (36.4%), diabetes 4 (36%) [Table 4].
Table 4: Association between outcome and study variables

Click here to view


According to the results of this cross-sectional study, risk of conversion was increased in male gender more than in female, as well as increase in patients with acute cholecystitis more than 72 h, patients with chronic cholecystitis, and patients with increasing age more than 49 years.

Also increase with increase with BMI more than 31.09 as shown in [Figure 1] in cases of biliary pancreatitis, as well as cases of, intraoperative bleeding 3 patients out of 11 because of obscure anatomy weather due to adhesions, fibrosus as shown in [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Distribution of patients according body mass index

Click here to view
Figure 2: Distribution of patients according outcome

Click here to view


Patients with chronic cholecystitis they showed high rate of conversion in this study 4 patients out of 11 patients [Table 4]. Regarding ERCP, it has no significant for risk for conversion as well as patients with DM has no relation for conversion.


  Discussion Top


The successful initial attempt of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was announced by Philip Mouret in 1987. There was a new era of laparoscopic surgery that changes the scope of surgical procedures and endoscopic surgical interventions using a wide variety of conceptions as well as new technical and strategic equipments. New procedures were emerged There are preoperative variable factors that can give signals for risk of conversion in certain patients and specific cases before surgical procedure being conducted. It should be noted that conversion to open from laparoscopy as a procedure should not be regarded as failure of procedure as the patient safety is the main priority of surgical outcome.[10]

In this study, the rate of conversions was 3.2% and a successful completion of the laparoscopic procedure was 96.8%, while many literature shows that there is 2%–15% of patients require conversion to open cholecystectomy and the reasons were mentioned in many literature. These high results of conversions were reported in spite of different operative strategies which were invented. The use of new modalities for safe dissection and mobilization of different surgical organs as: harmonic scalpel knife, electrical cattery, and bipolar hemostatic instruments, e.g., LigaSure.[9],[10],[11],[12]

Regarding age factor, many studies were found to have statistical significant associations with conversion rate, and others report association only with advanced age group.[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18]

In this study, we did not report association with age but conversion occurred in some cases, probably due to increasing co morbidity of older patients and systemic complications, so age is an independent risk factor for conversion this finding also same in other published literature.

In the current study, males carry significant risk factor for converting the procedure to open which is comparable with a result of a multicenter of hepatobiliary units, of different nations showed that a same results.[13] Of the laparoscopic cases, only 27% are male whereas for open operations, 42% were male. These findings of male sex being identified as a significant risk factor for conversion are consistent with the similar finding from several single institutions[9],[10],[16],[17],[18],[19] and also meta-analysis of the literature.[19] In this study, we have the same result and statistically approved that male was more common than female in association with converting the procedure to open [Table 4].

One of the main factors for conversion is the gallbladder condition whether acute, chronic, thick wall, associated with jaundice or not, and the complicated cholecystitis. To reach this various parameters, data have been analyzed in different studies include WBC, total serum bilirubin, alkaline phosphates, aspartate transaminase, and alanine transaminase. Leukocytosis is indicative of acute cholecystitis; however, if associated with systemic signs of sepsis, it is indicative of complicated cholecystitis such as empyema, perforation, gangrene while elevated liver enzymes particularly alkaline phosphates' are indicative of cholangitis or common bile ducts stones and coagulopathy. Which should be corrected whatever the cause being, making surgery possible.

Abdominal US EX had been done in all patients with gall stone disease its reliable, quick, noninvasive tool in diagnosis, but it is highly operator dependence.[20] It may give clue and may predict the degree of difficulty that may involve during the procedure. The finding of maximal wall thickness of >4.0 mm in fasting state may indicate fibrotic or contracted gallbladder which is difficult to be grasped during laparoscopy surgery.[21]

A meta-analysis study of diagnostic characteristics of US published in 1994 revealed sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 78% respectively.[ 19]

There are little data available to assess diagnosis of acute cholecystitis in chronic cholecystitis as diagnostic value for the severity of inflammation; US signs of severity of inflammation including Murphy's sign, pericholecystic fluid, gallbladder wall thickness, and gallbladder distention[22],[23] in spite of that the ability of prediction of difficulty of surgery by US EX remain limited.[24] The finding of air within the wall, or air within intraluminal of GB, marked irregularity of the wall of GB are specific features of gangrenous GB; these findings may also be seen in severe cases of disease without gangrene.[25],[26]

In most of the studies one of the predictors for conversion is acute cholecystitis if presentation more than 3–4 and 5 days the Golden period for cholycystectomy is first 72 hours of condition as well as the sonographic finding: of the wall thickness more than 3 mm in fasting state, presence of pericholecystic fluid in acute cholecystitis.[27] In our study there is increased risk of conversion in acute and chronic cholecystitis, and that compatible with other published studies all over the world.[22],[23],[24]

Procedure of palmers point entry in patients with previous abdominal surgery and suspected adhesions post biliary panceriatitis, to avoid bowel injury that necessitate conversion due to first port entry injuries.[28] In our study, there was no port site entry injury to the bowel or other intra-abdominal structures including cases with palmars point entry all passed successfully.

Regarding obesity as a risk factor for conversion, it is estimated in many literature that obese patient is difficult to perform surgery, but there is no increase in rate of conversion[29] while in our study, there was a significance risk for conversion due to obesity, BMI more than 31.09 SD 2.80 associated with conversion from laparoscopy to open.

Other operative finding, e.g., if there is no progression of the procedure for more than 20–30 min from the start of dissection in the Calot's triangle and if the procedure is extended for more than 2 h, the risk of perioperative complications is 4 times more than if the surgery completed within 30 to 60 minutes.[12]

In laparoscopic cholecystectomies, morbidity and mortality rates are similar to open surgery. However, the rate of bile duct injuries and leaks is higher in laparoscopic approach than in open cholecystectomy.[21]

Regarding anomalies of biliary tree or vascular anomalies e.g., caterpillars' of right hepatic artery, short multiple cystic arteries, aberrant cystic artery anterior cystic artery, as well as anomalies of biliary tree configuration, site of final insertion of cystic duct or aberrant right hepatic duct as well as choledocho-cholecystic duct communication, duct of Lushka, intrahepatic gallbladder these are operative finding and rarely can be anticipated preoperatively This area regarded as the most common wide anatomical variations in the GIT configurations whether biliary or vascular variations.[30] Abnormal anatomy found in 3 cases out of 11 converted cases but careful dissection and proper selection of intervention time enable completing surgery laproscopically although. Results showed no significant effect as a cause per see for conversion (significant P = 0.05) [Table 4].

Bleeding considered as a risk factor for conversion occurred mainly due to dense adhesions and fibrosis causing difficult dissection to clear view identification and clearance of cystic duct and obtain critical view of safety uncontrolled bleeding happed with injury to unexpected vessel which can not be controlled safely laproscopically.

In this study, bleeding reported in 3 cases out of the 11 cases of conversion [Table 4], which necessitate conversion but no major biliary tree or major vascular injury was occurred as well as neither morbidity after long follow-up nore mortality.

The critical view of safety was declared as the golden standard practice to see the liver bed through a window performed within Calot's Triangle.[30],[31]

Regarding biliary pancreatitis, high complication and mortality rates after early cholecystectomy in patients with severe pancreatitis have prompted guidelines recommending delaying cholecystectomy until all signs of inflammation have resolved (i.e., interval cholecystectomy).[32],[33],[34] Patients with mild biliary pancreatitis early cholecystectomy is advised; these are the current guidelines.[35],[36],[37]

The British Society of Gastroenterology recommend cholecystectomy within 2 weeks after discharge; Gastroenterological Association recommend that all patients with mild biliary pancreatitis should undergo cholecystectomy as soon as the patient has recovered from the attack (337).[36] In daily practice, cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis is often postponed for several weeks after hospital discharge (interval around 6 weeks after discharge from hospital admission for mild biliary pancreatitis.[38]

A danger of perioperative complications in early cholecystectomy after acute pancreatitis is a reason for the delay in cholecystectomy.[39] It is believed that distorted biliary tract anatomy by inflammation and edema may complicate dissection with a higher risk of conversion and surgical complications, such as bile duct injury.[32],[40]

According to the guidelines, laparoscopic cholecystectomy were done to those patients with history of biliary pancreatitis if they were being clinically and supported by laboratory investigation that pancreatitis was resolved and even that selection were practiced conversion still occurred due to: dense adhesions, cannot visualize proper anatomy and bleeding occurred in 4 patient out of 11 conversion total patient and these goes with same finding similar with other studies all over the ward.[32],[40]


  Conclusion Top


There are several factors that will increase risk of conversion. Male Gender, presence of acute cholecystitis more than >4–5 days, biliary pancreatitis, BMI more than 31.09, certain US finding (wall thickness more than 3 mm pericholecystic shown by ultrasound examination). No progression of dissection of Calot's triangle intraoperative uncontrolled bleeding which cannot be managed laparoscopically, chronic cholecystitis, but study showed there is no association with: diabetes mellitus, as well as abnormal anatomical variations as risk for conversion.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Gunning JE, Rosenzweig BA. Evolution of endoscopic surgeryIn. In: White RA, editor. Endoscopic Surgery. Boston: Mosby Year Book; 1991. p. 1-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Litynski GS. Erich Mühe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): A surgeon ahead of his time. JSLS 1998;2:341-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Mühe E. Laparoskopischecholecystektomie. EndoskopieHeute 1990;4:262-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Walker R Jr. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 2001;5:89-94.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Mühe E. Laparoskopischecholezystektomie-Spatergebnisse. LangenbecksArchiv Fur Chirurgie. Supplement. Kongressband. DeutscheGesellschaft Fur Chirurgie. Kongress 1991:416-23.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Mühe E. Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 1992;24:754-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Litynski GS. Profiles in laparoscopy: Mouret, Dubois, and Perissat: the laparoscopic breakthrough in Europe (1987-1988). JSLS 1999;3:163-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Mouret P. How I developed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1996;25:744-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Alponat A, Kum CK, Koh BC, Rajnakova A, Goh PM. Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopy Cholecystectomy.World J Surg 1997;21:629-33.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Wiebke EA, Pruitt AL, Howard TJ, Jacobson LE, Broadie TA, Goulet RJ Jr., et al. Conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. An analysis of risk factors. Surg Endosc 1996;10:742-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Rosen M, Brody F, Ponsky J. Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2002;184:254-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Giger UF. Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery Database. J Am CollSurg 2006;203:723-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Livingston EH, Rege RV. A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2004;188:205-11.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Brodsky A, Matter I, Sabo E, Cohen A, Abrahamson J, Eldar S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Can the need for conversion and the probability of complications be predicted? A prospective study. Surg Endosc 2000;14:755-60.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Schäfer M, Krähenbühl L, Büchler MW. Predictive factors for the type of surgery in acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 2001;182:291-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kama NA, Kologlu M, Doganay M, Reis E, Atli M, Dolapci M. A risk score for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2001;181:520-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kauvar DS, Brown BD, Braswell AW?, Harnisch M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly: Increased operative complications and conversions to laparoscopy.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005;15:379-82:PMID: 16108740 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2005.15.379.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Sikora SS, Kumar A, Saxena R, Kapoor VK, Kaushik SP. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy-can conversion be predicted? World J Surg 1995;19:858-60.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Shea JA, Berlin JA, Escarce JJ, Clarke JR, Kinosian BP, Cabana MD, et al. Revised estimates of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity in suspected biliary tract disease. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:2573-81.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Prian GW, Norton LW, Evle J Jr., Eiseman B. Clinical indications and accuracy of gray scale Ultrasonography in the patients with suspected biliary tract disease. Am J Surg 1977;134:705-11.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Cuschieri A, Berci G. The difficult cholecystectomy in laparoscopic biliary surgery. 2nd ed. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1992. p. 101-15.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Bennett GL, Balthazar EJ. Ultrasound and CT evaluation of emergent gallbladder pathology. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41:1203-16.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Menu Y, Vuillerme MP. Non-traumatic abdominal emergencies: imaging and intervention in acute biliary conditions. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2397-406.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Bingener J, Schwesinger W, Chopra S, Richards ML, Sirinek KR. Does the correlation of acute Cholecystitis on ultrasound and at surgery reflect a mirror image? Am Jr Surg 2004;188:PMID:15619487 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.060.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Merriam LT, Kanaan SA, Dawes LC, et al. Gangrenous cholecystitis diagnosed by ultrasound. Radiology 1983;148:219-21.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Teefey SA, Baron RL, Radke HM, Bigler SA. Gangrenous cholecystitis: new observations on sonography. J Ultrasound Med 1991;10:603-6.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Hayashi AK, Soudry G, Dibos PE. Rim sign. Radionuclide imaging in a patient with acute gangrenous cholecystitis and cholelithiasis after nonspecific abdominal ultrasonography. Clin Nucl Med 1997;22:388-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Aust TR, Kayani SI, Rowlands DJ. Direct optical entry through Palmer's point: A new technique for those at risk of entry-related trauma at laparoscopy. Gynecol Surg 2010;7:315-17.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Farkas, Daniel &Moradi, Dovid&Moaddel, David &Nagpal, Kamal & Cosgrove, John. (2011). The impact of body mass index on outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical endoscopy. 26. 964-9. 10.1007/s00464-011-1978-5.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Last RJ, McMinn RM. Lasts Anatomy, Regional and Applied. 7th ed. Singapore: British library Cataloging Data publishers (Churchill Livingstone, Robert, Stevenson House, 1-3 Baxters Place, Leith Walk, Edinburgh, EHI 3AF). Produced by longman Singapore Publishers Pte Ltd; 1984.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Al Helli A, Al Taee M, Al Khafaji M. Laparoscopic surgical anatomy of calotstriangle. Kerbala J Med 2011;4:957-63.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Kelly TR, Wagner DS. Gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial of the timing of surgery. Surgery 1988;104:600-5.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Nealon WH, Bawduniak J, Walser EM. Appropriate timing of ch olecystectomy inpatients who present with moderate to severe gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis withperipancreatic fluid collections. Ann Surg 2004;239:741-9.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Schachter P, Peleg T, Cohen O. Interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis. HPB Surg 2000;11:319-22.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Forsmark CE, Baillie J. AGA Institute technical review on acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2007;132:2022-044.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2013;13:e1-15.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology, Association of Surgeons of GreatBritain and Ireland, Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland and Association ofUpper GI Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut 2005;54 Suppl 3:iii1-9.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Bakker OJ, Van Santvoort HC, Hagenaars JC, Besselink MG, Bollen TL, Gooszen HG, et al. Timing of cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1446-54.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Monkhouse SJ, Court EL, Dash I, Coombs NJ. Two-week target for laparoscopic cholecystectomy following gallstone pancreatitis is achievable and cost neutral. Br J Surg 2009;96:751-5.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Tate JJ, Lau WY and Li AK. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1994;815:720-2.  Back to cited text no. 40
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed280    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded18    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal